Repository index

Grid view | Table view

Search for anything in the search bar above, including full content of all documents. Use " " for expressions and use the faceted search filters to narrow the search results. Private documents (like thesis files) will only display a snippet of the search results.

Displaying 1 - 44 of 44 results.
PublicationDebreczeni István20251182Pages: 113--115

PublicationKiss Jenő20251181Pages: 113--118

PublicationSipos Gábor20241175Pages: 581--584

PublicationPapp György20241175Pages: 578--579

PublicationDebreczeni István20241172Pages: 221--224

PublicationNév Nélkül2023Pages: 363--364

PublicationVisky Sándor Béla2024Pages: 365

Ez a kötet a Kolozsvári Protestáns Teológiai Intézet által szervezett II. Tavaszy-napok konferencia előadásait tartalmazza.

PublicationVisky Sándor Béla2023Pages: 368

Ez a kötet a Kolozsvári Protestáns Teológiai Intézet által szervezett I. Tavaszy-konferencia előadásainak publikált változatait tartalmazza.

PublicationMagyar Balázs Dávid20231164Pages: 389--404

ThesisGáti Gábor2023Pages: 58Supervisor: Visky Sándor Béla, Papp György

In this research, I have explored the theme of the immortality of the soul in the light of Plato's and Calvin's view of the soul. The work is divided into two major parts: in the first part, I examined Plato's and Calvin's view of the soul and the immortality of the soul, and in the second part, I compared the results of the first part. In the course of this research, I have discovered the similarities and differences in the details of the two conceptions. Eight units of thought were identified for the comparison and within these units, different themes were compared between the two conceptions. In the last point, one of the main questions of the topic was answered, namely whether the soul is immortal or impermanent. Although Plato and Calvin had different points of view, in the end the two concepts were the same: the soul is immortal.

PublicationPapp György2021Pages: 146--158

Theis paper analyses the concept of “imago Dei” based on the 6th answer of the Heidelberg Catechism. I chose this topic as it is one of the most controversial questions of systematic theology. If one browses through the dogmatic and ethical works written from the earliest period of Christianity to the most recent times, they will find a large variety of answers. All of these attempt to explain what the writer of Genesis meant by the expression na‘aśęh ’ ādām beṣalmenu kidemutenu. The Heidelberg Catechism deals with this topic in the 6th answer where the authors attested that God did not create the first human being godless and malicious. After stating that as a matter of fact, God created man according to his own image and likeness, the Catechism explains the term imago Dei in a twofold way: first, it seeks to define the inner content of the image and similitude of God, and secondly it expands upon the purpose of man given by God as the image of his creator within the creation.

PublicationPapp György2021Pages: 172

This volume contains selected papers from the broader field of History of Christian Doctrines, and more specifically from Patristics and Reformation studies, but also from the border between them. Most of them were written in the academic year 2014-2015, during my MA studies in the field of Patristics at the Theological University of the (vrijgemaakt) Reformed Churches in the Netherlands, in Kampen. The main topic of the MA programme was the Baptism in the Early Church, therefore the most of these papers presents various aspects of this question. In the following few paragraphs I will present short summary of each paper from this volume.

PublicationPapp György2019Pages: 245--270

A tanulmány célja bemutatni az 1Móz 1,26-ban olvasható kijenetés (teremtsünk embert a mi képünkre és hasonlatosságunkra) héber és görög szövege közötti kapcsolatot.

PublicationSimon János20141073Pages: 359--360

PublicationSimon János20141074Pages: 469--469

PublicationSimon János20151082Pages: 228--228

PublicationAdorjáni Zoltán20151084Pages: 453--455

PublicationSimon János20151084Pages: 459--461

PublicationSimon János20151085Pages: 590--592

PublicationBalogh Csaba20161092Pages: 215--216

PublicationPapp György20161094Pages: 401--418

Minden tudományág művelőjének kiválóan kell ismernie tudománya tárgyát, és ez a követelmény az emberrel foglalkozó tudományok esetében is fennáll. Így például a jó orvosnak nem elég csupán a beteg fiziológiai panaszaival foglalkoznia, hiszen akkor csak a tüneteket kezeli, hanem a teljes embert kell szem előtt tartania. A jó pszichológusnak is hasonlóképpen kell cselekednie, ha érdemben akar foglalkozni az ember úgynevezett lelki világának gondozásával. Az említett követelmény fokozottan igaz a teológiára is. Ugyanis a teológiai tudománynak az ember is tárgya. Amikor azonban úgy beszélünk a teológiáról, mint amely az emberrel is foglalkozik, világosan kell látnunk néhány dolgot.

PublicationZabán Bálint Károly20171103Pages: 316--330

PublicationAdorjáni Zoltán20171106Pages: 684--686

PublicationAdorjáni Zoltán20181112Pages: 247--248

PublicationMagyar Balázs Dávid20181115Pages: 566--573

PublicationSimon János20191121Pages: 110--111

PublicationBalogh Csaba20201131Pages: 83--84

PublicationAdorjáni Zoltán20201132Pages: 190--192

PublicationRezi Elek, Adorjáni Dezső Zoltán, Sógor Csaba, Kiss Jenő, Benkő Timea20111044Pages: 351--355

Rektori köszöntés - Rezi Elek, a Kolozsvári Protestáns Teológia rektora. Védnöki beszédek - Adorjáni Dezső-Zoltán, a Romániai Evangélikus-Lutheránus Egyház püspöke; Sógor Csaba európai parlamenti képviselő, RMDSZ és ENP Képviselőcsoport. Témafelvezetés - Benkő Tímea és Kiss Jenő a Kolozsvári Protestáns Teológia tanárai