Repository index

Grid view | Table view

Search for anything in the search bar above, including full content of all documents. Use " " for expressions and use the faceted search filters to narrow the search results. Private documents (like thesis files) will only display a snippet of the search results.

Displaying 1 - 26 of 26 results.
PublicationPapp György202415Pages: 57--73

The Camel and the Eye of the Needle. This paper examines Jesus’ challenging statement in the Gospels about the rich entering the Kingdom of God, likened to a camel through a needle’s eye. We explore variations in this saying across the Gospels and consider interpretations aided by literary parallels from Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic sources. These examples highlight the “eye of a needle” as a metaphor for impossibility, contrasted with a large object like a camel or elephant. While the presented examples are post-biblical, the motif’s roots may be older. Regardless of the original animal (camel, elephant, or rope), Jesus emphasises God’s power compared to human limitations. This explains the disciples’ astonishment and Jesus’ reply: human limitations exist, but “with God all things are possible” (Matthew 19:26, Mark 10:27, Luke 18:27).

PublicationKató Szabolcs Ferencz202415Pages: 11--28

Joseph, the father of Jesus, and Joseph, the son of Jacob. Observations on the Joseph figure in the Gospel of Matthew. The Gospel of Matthew (Mt) connects his texts with the Old Testament in various ways. Beyond the so-called reflexive quotations, Mt alludes to several Old Testament books and episodes with keywords, motifs, and compositional arrangement. This article investigates whether Mt uses a Joseph typology from Genesis in shaping his portrayal of Joseph, the father of Jesus. After a brief survey of the suggested links in this regard, the paper defines the concept of intertextuality at play here and evaluates the alleged parallels between the Joseph of Genesis and the Joseph of Mt. It seems that in the prelude, Mt presents his gospel as “the Book of the Genesis of Jesus Christ”, akin to a second Genesis.

PublicationSzász Béla190143Pages: 170

PublicationSzász Béla190042Pages: 220

PublicationNév Nélkül189336Pages: 176

PublicationVajda Ferenc189235Pages: 190

PublicationNév Nélkül189134Pages: 206

PublicationVajda Ferenc189033Pages: 176

PublicationZayzon János188832Pages: 176

PublicationIncze Lajos188731Pages: 158

PublicationNév Nélkül188428Pages: 163

PublicationNév Nélkül188327Pages: 142

PublicationNév Nélkül188326Pages: 149

PublicationNév Nélkül188225Pages: 117

PublicationNév Nélkül188124Pages: 193

PublicationNév Nélkül188023Pages: 163

PublicationNév Nélkül187922Pages: 173